Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
| These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
|---|---|
| Request completed | |
| Request declined | |
| Information | |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
[edit]Sahilsambyal
[edit]- Sahilsambyal (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Journalist Of Bharat (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Suspected sockpuppet of Sahilsambyal Official Potrait (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) and Journalist Of Bharat uploaded the same file:Kunal Jaiswal in 2024.jpg. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Results:
Confirmed to each other and
Likely to this case:
- Journalist Of Bharat (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Journalist of Hindustan (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Worvandae
[edit]- Worvandae (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- YHPVE4VPH (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Ni.Nguyen.VCLCA (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason:The next sock of Worvandae, Đăng Đàn Cung, want to change Category:Xiangqi to Category:General chess. This is a game from China, but they called it by a name translated from Vietnamese, and they need to discuss this beforehand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrydat (talk • contribs)
Results:
Confirmed together with a couple of socks, all blocked and tagged and to be found added to Category:Sockpuppets of Đăng Đàn Cung. --Lymantria (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Global lock requested. --Lymantria (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
DaduSreep
[edit]- DaduSreep (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- MillyLinced (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- JoinKepper (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) >> master
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Creating pages in non-existent language (vi-th/vi-thu). Already CU-confirmed on Meta. Please check for sleepers. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed no sleepers found, all were already locked, tagging. Moving case under JoinKepper as the oldest account. --Lymantria (talk) 13:56, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
~2025-38330-64
[edit]- ~2025-38330-64 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- ~2025-38330-64 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- ~2025-38330-45 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- ~2025-38330-15 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Related IP address, if any (talk • contribs • IP address, if any/lookup WHOIS • IP address, if any.html RBL • tools • luxo's • IP address, if any crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Reported to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections by Tvpuppy Suspicious behaviour, warrants a closer look Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Request completed - From looking at the IP address behind the temporary account, and from digging through the edit histories of categories related to the issue (both of which any admin could do), I've identified that this person has been active for years, always within the same IPv6 range. I've placed a block on that range. There is no abuse of multiple accounts - I don't see any evidence that they're deliberately trying to avoid scrutiny (and neither ~2025-38330-45 nor ~2025-38330-15 has edits on this project, so I have no idea what you meant in the suspected related users section); the issue is the bad categories, which you can address with them should they ever create an account. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:48, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Erika Dauði
[edit]- Erika Dauði (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Livioandronico2013 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Related IP address, if any (talk • contribs • IP address, if any/lookup WHOIS • IP address, if any.html RBL • tools • luxo's • IP address, if any crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: This new user's behavior is too similar to another user's sockpuppet. More information in this discussion:
Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Fake_edits_and_FPC_voting_rules
--George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Unrelated As best as I can tell, Livioandronico2013 hasn't been active since 2024, and therefore there's no current data to match them on. Erika Dauði is not, however, a match for their historic data. That said, even if they're not a sock of Livioandronico2013, if you feel that their gaming of the FPC voting requirements is block-worthy, you can act accordingly, of course. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:04, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
ALi BOUBACAR
[edit]- ALi BOUBACAR (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Prince kko (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Mr Williamn (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Julian Finn (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Emma Sophia Olivia (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Gabriel Louis Leo (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Hudson Grayson (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Archie Freddie (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- ~2025-39527-54 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) (on wikidata)
- ~2025-39539-34 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) (on wikidata)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Persistent self-promotion using multiple accounts. No contribs to wm projects. --Achim55 (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed All of the accounts except for ALi BOUBACAR and Prince kko.
Stale but
It looks like a duck to me for ALi BOUBACAR and Prince kko.- I uncovered 14 socks total, which are at Category:Sockpuppets of ALi BOUBACAR.
- No comment on the IPs, as always.
- All socks blocked and tagged.
Thanks, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Arsya Tiara Shafa
[edit]- Arsya Tiara Shafa (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Ozymandros Caelum (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Both accounts stole photos from the same Instagram post (https://www.instagram.com/p/DNsdGkQ3quw/ ) and left behind the same naming pattern and formatted EXIF metadata, such as the title and the software user ID.
Arsya Tiara Shafa
- File:Lokomotif B2503 Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa.jpg (img_6)
- File:Lokomotif B5112 di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa (1).jpg (img_8)
- File:Lokomotif B5112 di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa (4).jpg (img_4)
- File:Lokomotif B5112 di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa (3).jpg (img_5)
- File:Lokomotif B5112 di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa (2).jpg (img_9)
- File:Lokomotif B2503 di Rawa Pening (3).jpg (img_3)
Ozymandros Caelum
- File:Lokomotif B2503 di Rawa Pening (1).jpg (img_2)
- File:Lokomotif B2503 di Museum Kereta Api Ambarawa.jpg (img_11)
0x0a (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done Arsya Tiara Shafa has worked for one day at Commons, only days too long ago to be able to to CU, so the account is
Stale. Not many edit by Ozymandros Caelum are recent enough either. --Lymantria (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Smit jone
[edit]- Smit jone (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Julia Pauling (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Lisa Caterham (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: File was shortly recreated (File creation log) after being deleted and inserted into a Wikidata item (Wikidata:Special:History/Q124608566). All of the accounts made very few edits on Commons and Wikidata. --0x0a (talk) 10:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed plus a bunch of others. See Category:Sockpuppets of אפרת שמו. All are blocked and tagged. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Case renamed, files deleted, marking as done. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
GMatteotti
[edit]GMatteotti (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Renatnom (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Interest in files originally uploaded by GMatteotti, please see Special:History/File:Giambattista Dal Piaz.jpg. Just checked and blocked on itwiki. --Titore (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed to earlier (suspected) socks. --Lymantria (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Cd1004
[edit]- Cd1004 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Earlier appointed to Er1097 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Fr9501 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Theplant908 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Indpop98 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- SCC01 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Poliwag38 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- ~2025-38375-74 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- ~2025-38699-92 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- Maria123123123123 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Cpopjm (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Jm9697 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Following a report on the Spanish Wikipedia, there is a possible multiaccount that is occasionally using socks and temporary accounts to impulsively add content about musical groups from a particular record label, especially Spanish bands from the 1990s and 2000s. Note the master's username is the globally blocked user. On Wikimedia Commons, several accounts have begun uploading images and photos of the bands and their concerts. The status of these photos and video clips is unknown, but based on the Spanish Wikipedia report, there are concerns about their licensing and maybe is some kind of uncontrolled promotion using temporal accounts. Taichi (talk) 02:01, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Results:
Confirmed to each other:
- MSA345 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Cpopjm (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- The3pvz (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Luigi6349898 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Theplant908 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Jm9697 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Indiepopuwu (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Indpop97 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Cd1004 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Very
Likely to these:
- SCC01 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Poliwag38 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Indpop98 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Fr9501 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Maria123123123123 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Except for the last user, all blocked.
Deferred to Tagging to master is only possible after eswiki-results are available, as master is not registered at Commons. CU does not comment on temporary accounts as that would reveal IP-info to too many users. --Lymantria (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- The oldest account is Cd1004, link to Er1097 not conclusive enough at eswiki to make them master here. Moving the case. --Lymantria (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives