Commons:Deletion requests/2025/12/10

9 December 2025

11 December 2025

Deletion requests on 10 December 2025

December 10

1996 WA election maps uploaded by Thomascampbell123 (talk · contribs)

As the original uploaded of this file I want it to be deleted. That's because the 1992 and 1996 presidential elections in Washington State were not comparable as Perot came in second place in some Washington counties in 1992. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unfortunately, the files cannot be automatically deleted at the uploader's request because they have been up longer than seven days. @Thomascampbell123: perhaps you could elaborate and tell us more about why you don't think these maps are useful. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that these maps are useful because an independent presidential candidate (Ross Perot) finished ahead of George H. W. Bush in some counties in Washington State in 1992. Therefore that election cannot really be compared with the previous and following elections. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomascampbell123: (1) Is anything now different than when you uploaded? (2) Do you intend to replace them with something that better conveys that information? - Jmabel ! talk 04:39, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My answer to your first question is that no, nothing is now different than when I uploaded. My answer to your second question is that no, I do not intend to replace them with something that better conveys that information. However, there already is a note on the 1992 presidential election in Washington page that states Perot finished ahead of Bush in some counties. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the underlying numbers (not the images), it looks like comparing '96 to '92 Perot's share of the vote went about equally to the two major parties, so I'm not sure that makes the trend less valid.

Also: what's the difference between the "swing" and the "trend"? - Jmabel ! talk 23:32, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that the uploader has had a chance to elaborate Phillipedison1891 (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ماهان تیموری.png

Out of scope MJXVI (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Would be CSD F10 Phillipedison1891 (talk) 05:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Zetsuen (talk · contribs)

Dubious own-work claims. Low resolution, no EXIF, and File:Kurdish Peshmerga Iraq.gif is clearly a picture of a monitor.

✗plicit 00:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muhammad Khan Interview on medcom id.png

It's not relevant with the person anymore Kaan Lativan (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Used on multiple WMF projects, not sure what makes it "not relevant anymore" Phillipedison1891 (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saif 20181207 074115.jpg

Photo of pebbles, no context as to why this would be in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devonshire Street Surry Hils 004aa bright.jpg

photo is unusable as it contains glitches, the original file is currently in use instead Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 00:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This "bright" version was not done by me. I don't know who did it, but it wasn't me. Some interloper has been mucking about with these images. I suggest we delete it and then clobber the person who did it. Sardaka (talk) 08:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thumbnail IMG 7716.jpg

Signed French artwork from 1922. Only has a US license, could be PD if artist died before 1955 (soon to be before 1956). Abzeronow (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The "Mary Evans Picture Library" (British) is currently selling rights to this illustration. The signature is... "Tortelier"? Maybe? Google Lens is no help. I've added {{Orphan works}}, maybe it's eligible under that policy. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update I contacted the Mary Evans Picture Library and they have no idea who the artist is either, so it's highly unlikely that they actually control the copyright. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The signature is apparently Torlotin or Torloting. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that I've edited {{Orphan works}} to lay out the policy Phillipedison1891 (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Quai Florentin (54971028157).jpg

No COM:FOP in France, I uploaded by mistake pls delete. KMB1933 (talk) 01:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G7 Phillipedison1891 (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:CN Tower (10318427783).jpg

out of scope - blurry nighttime cityscape photo Mind matrix 02:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retrato Oficial, Natalia Díaz Quintana (cropped).jpg

image is copyrighted. no proof of CC 4.0 and bottom of webpage indicates copyright https://web.archive.org/web/20231215182221/http://www.presidencia.go.cr/gabinete/ministerio-de-la-presidencia PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 02:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retrato Oficial, Natalia Díaz Quintana.jpg

image is copyrighted. no proof of CC 4.0 and bottom of webpage indicates copyright https://web.archive.org/web/20231215182221/http://www.presidencia.go.cr/gabinete/ministerio-de-la-presidencia PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 02:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saddam Hussain Duty Uniform.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ~2025-39034-15 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file is tagged as PD-Iraq, but the stated source (majalla.com / المجلة) is a Saudi Arabian magazine, not an Iraqi publication. Therefore the work was not first published in Iraq, and Iraqi copyright law does not apply. The uploader misapplied PD-Iraq, which requires the work to originate from Iraq or be published there. Since Majalla is a copyrighted Saudi media outlet, this file is under Saudi copyright, not Iraqi public domain. No valid free license is provided. Converted to regular DR, the image is in use in multiple wikis, so there should be a discussion for this. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 03:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bijal playing Surando in front of Dhaj the Great (Rai Diyach) scene of the folktale of Sorath Rai Diyach.jpg and extracts

This file was initially tagged by Gotitbro as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: In no uncertain terms does the academic link state "© EFT and Zuliqar Ali Kalhoro, 2014. All right reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher." Phillipedison1891 (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extracts of this file also tagged as copyvio:

Keep Copyright claim on website is not valid under {{PD-Art}}. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Was cleaning up cross-wiki abuse/hoaxes by a sock network when I came across these uploads. I am not sure about the panorama rights in Pakistan or if they even apply here. Nonetheless, "Dhaj The Great" in the file names is itself a hoax of the sock network and needs to removed from the titles (for details see Commons:Categories for discussion/2025/11/Category:Ror Empire). Gotitbro (talk) 05:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For our purposes, freedom of panorama is really only an issue for 3D works of art - sculpture, architecture, etc. Photos and scans of 2D art assume the copyright status of the art itself. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 14:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team-photo.jpg

This image was uploaded by a new editor who apparently misunderstood the meaning of "own work"; the editor in question is not the person who took this photograph in 1945. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:RP - Jun 6 - CCA.jpg

Metadata says copyright holder is Sevenmedia, which appears to be a PR agency and thus makes me want VRT for this file. Abzeronow (talk) 04:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rsz first-source-solutions-walk-in.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as no permission (No permission since). However, to me it looks like a self-made collage of an unproblematic logo and a blurry photo, which I could not find on the companies web site. Please elaborate, if it should be deleted. NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution screenshot. Looks sus to me. Abzeronow (talk) 04:48, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oybin Annandale NSW.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oybin Annandale NSW Black and white.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 04:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:GillesMihalcean Portrait.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Aplucas0703 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierre Flynn, 2025.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Aplucas0703 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait de Pierre Flynn en 2015.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Aplucas0703 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Purandara Dasa painting.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Aplucas0703 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janeese Lewis George in 2019 (cropped).jpg

Very low quality crop of another image. A better quality cropped close-up of the image can easily be produced if necessary. File currently not in use anywhere. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 05:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ordine degli Avvocati di Caltagirone - Delitto Tentato, concorso di persone e reato associativo di stampo mafioso.jpg

No FoP in Italy per COM:FOP Italy, and government works are protected for 20 years. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination Arrow303 (talk) 19:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carl Gustaf 8.4cm recoilless rifle users.png

Inferior file, contents modernized + updated to .svg at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carl_Gustaf_8.4cm_recoilless_rifle_users.svg TruncateVirus99 (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khartoum Place2.JPG

FOP does not apply to two-dimensional artworks in New Zealand. Schwede 66 06:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Two artists both living. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All images in Category:Auckland Women's Suffrage Memorial should also be deleted. Perhaps File:Khartoum Place, Auckland Square I.jpg too but COM:DEMINIMIS might apply to that one. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I look at that and thought that de minimis does apply, hence I didn't nominate it. Schwede 66 20:46, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim Louis.jpg

This image shows the artist Louis Durot together with a non-notable individual (his former agent). According to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia guidelines, photos including non-relevant people are not appropriate for biographical articles and do not provide encyclopedic value. A new, more relevant photo showing only the artist will be uploaded shortly. Please delete this file for lack of encyclopedic relevance and presence of a non-notable subject. ~2025-39707-80 (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In use on fr:Louis Durot. In addition, there is a Category:Kim Chi Pho. --Achim55 (talk) 09:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Oberpahlen (talk · contribs)

files from https://www.muis.ee/ where no info about copyrights haven't determined properly. Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These photos are marked with different public domain licences in muis.ee. They cannot be used for commercial purposes but otherwise they are free to use ~2025-39776-95 (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These photos are marked with different public domain licences in muis.ee. They cannot be used for commercial purposes but otherwise they are free to use. Oberpahlen (talk) 07:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No source for many of the dates. Even based on the dates provided, the photos would be subject to URAA restoration in the US. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 17:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xxiissmm (talk · contribs)

May be above COM:TOO South Korea. Not entirely sure (except for the Cortis logo), would like for any discussion on it.

reppop^talk 07:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:T.Okmanas.jpg

This photo was first uploaded as File:TomasOkmanas.jpg by Jr.Girenas where the author was specified as being unknown. After that file got deleted, it got re-uploaded by User:Dmustage765 who claims this to be their own work. EXIF data are missing. I think we need a written permission for this through COM:VRT to clarify the copyright situation for this photo. AFBorchert (talk) 08:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel K Magia.jpg

Same as his insta profile pic https://www.instagram.com/danielkmagia/ - unlikely to be own workl Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura Toenjes October 28 2025.jpg

Clearly a DW of another photo. Needs sourcing to keep Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if there was a source, I would find the quality too poor/bad. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 17:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I personally captured this photo during the Kyrene School board meeting on October 28, 2025. As you can see from the photo metadata, the image was captured on the same date.

This meets the Wikipedia guidelines for Creative Commons images. Empennage (talk) 02:12, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Harirajmadheswaran (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted patterns, moodboards, etc. not own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Jiří Jun

Artworks by living Czech artist (Jiri Jun (Q67008757)), not out of copyright, no permission.

Nutshinou (talk) 09:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete CSD F1 Phillipedison1891 (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les frères René, Lucien, Marcel, Georges et Léon Blum.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Aeengath as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: =Source is from a 1996 publication with no free licence;
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the image itself is in the public domain, the immediate source doesn't really matter. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Túrelio, I tagged the file because the only version I could find is the reproduction in a 1996 book and I couldn’t confirm whether the original photograph itself is in the public domain. If someone can show that the original photo is PD then I have no objection to keeping the file. -Aeengath (talk) 10:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with cropped version: File:René Blum.jpg

Keep The license appears correct to me. Republishing an historic image does not restart the copyright clock, and the 1996 prepublication makes no mention of the image being previously unpublished. Books and websites republish historic public domain images. US courts have ruled that these photographs are made public when they leave the custody of the photographer. --RAN (talk) 03:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmad bin Ali Stadium.jpg

Per COM:FOP Qatar, photos of architecture not allowed. ~2025-33006-17 (talk) 09:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:日生不動産Logo.svg

画像提供依頼が存在しないため TK2264 (talk) 09:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu Metro 深圳萬象城 Shenzhen MIXC Shopping Mall Landmark Di Wang Square shop La Queen Wig store July 2023 Px3 recruitment poster.jpg

The 2D artwork exceeds TOO Midleading (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山區 Nanshan 深南大道 Shennan Blvd 何香凝美術館 He Xiangning Art Museum August 2023 Px3 104.jpg

China does not allow FOP of text Midleading (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 車公廟站 Chegongmiao Station artwork August 2023 Px3 02.jpg

China does not allow FOP of text Midleading (talk) 09:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Финский солдат сидит на StuG III, 23 июня 1944 года..jpg

CopyVio. Nickel nitride (talk) 09:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milton glaser at studio.jpg

See URAA warning on the file page. Unless there is evidence this was simulatenously published in the US, this should still be under copyright in the US. Based5290 (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Scottish Rite Temple (Manila)

These busts were unveiled on March 15, 1991, as per the markers on the pedestals. Unknown sculptor(s), but the busts were apparently donations. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines, these images infringe on the sculptural copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/S2352226721000350

Taken from a journal article which was published by Science Direct under a CC license, but it is a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. So the files should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 10:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Rex.jpg

Copyrighted image taken from a copyrighted website. Nv8200pa (talk) 10:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carson Ellis.jpg

Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The author in the summary cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 10:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:CarsonEllis.jpg

Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The author in the summary cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Fondation Louis Vuitton

No FOP in France.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Fondation Louis Vuitton

No freedom of panorama in France. Architect Frank Gehry is still alive.

A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Fondation Louis Vuitton - Paris (50577213051).jpg, nothing copyrightable. Keep File:Louis Vuitton Foundation, with peacocks.jpg, cropped and now undoubtlessly de minimis. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all deleted except for the two identified by Rod. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Fondation Louis Vuitton

No COM:FOP France. Architecture by Frank Gehry (d. 2025), PD in 2096.

File:Fondation Louis-Vuitton, across basin.jpg

Consigned (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:FMIOPH fergana.png

kinldy delete Umi951 (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:NOTUSED, request by uploader though outside 7 days. This logo is likely copyrighted. Consigned (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fondation Louis Vuitton sculpted logo facade.jpg

No COM:FOP France. Not sure if the overall LV logo is simple enough for public domain, but the rippled texture likely exceeds COM:TOO France. This is on a building by Frank Gehry (d. 2025), the ripples might be his design but might not. Consigned (talk) 10:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chef Andrea Camagna at work.jpg

I am the author and I request deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre1283901 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:«Subway, Mom & son» 2013, կտավ, յուղաներկ 100X120 սմ.jpg

lower quality version of File:«Subway, Mom & son» 2013, կտավ, յուղաներկ 100X120 սմ.jpg BIULibraries (talk) 10:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:202401011756 IMG 8007.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As a wanted poster created by a government agency, this should be {{PD-Japan-exempt}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per IronGargoyle--John123521 (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:202401011756 IMG 8007.jpg

We request that the image be removed because the poster in question contains the real name of a criminal suspect, which is prohibited by jawp (subject to deletion under w:ja:WP:DP#B-2). Daraku K. (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Your rules on Japanese Wikipedia are not our rules, this is an example of a Commons:Non-copyright restriction and we do not delete for that reason. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 15:10, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Since it is not possible to delete it due to COM:NCR, I will withdraw this request. There is an article on jawp that uses this image, but jawp has already submitted a version-specific deletion request for this article. Daraku K. (talk) 03:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:WINDY HARBOUR from a distance.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Loomhigh223555 (talk) 11:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion was requested by the uploader shortly after upload but file is COM:INUSE at Wikidata. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emidao with his Covid-19 service certificate.jpg

This is my picture and I want it to be removed beccause I uploaded when I was just exploring Wikimedia Commons, Additionally, I am not a public figure to have my personal image uplpaded in any platform. It is my right to live a dignified and private life. Dime1597 (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tweety Bird Frame.jpg

Character is PD, but his depiction there is still copyrighted SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shmackle-Logo.png

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I originally tagged this with PD-logo because the original license was obviously false. However, upon further searching, the logo seems to be of similar complexity to w:File:Microsoft Copilot Icon.svg, which is copyrighted. Based5290 (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:2025-11-18 Event, Besuch der Kronprinzessin Victoria von Schweden beim deutschen Bundespräsidenten Frank-Walter Steinmeier im November 2025 STP 9819.jpg

Wolf Röhricht died in 1953, so this work is in the public domain in Germany now. However, it was created in 1952 (see [1]), so (because of the URAA) it is still protected by copyright in the United States, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2048.

The file was uploaded with a PD-old-70-expired tag, claiming that the shown work was published in the US before 1930, but since it is a 1952 painting, that cannot be true. Rosenzweig τ 12:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:WCR logo.png

No reason Thebaldball (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Costa Rica is not listed in Commons:Threshold of originality SomeFancyUsername (talk) 12:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Юлия Трус (talk · contribs)

Spam. Was. Not in use now guess why.

Bilderling (talk) 12:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Due to lack of Exif-data this files might be copyvio SomeFancyUsername (talk) 12:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nueva Terminal 2025 Aeropuerto Jorge Chavez.jpg

it's doubtful whether it's own work — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:А.Беляев.png

If the author is unknown. how do you know, that (s)he is 70 years dead? For circa 1917 photos this is not obvious. In addition, Russia demands often 74 years from death. No first publication data. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Våldsnatten i Stockholm 2025.webp

This is from a surveillance camera, not "own work". Ariam (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casper Englund, Joey Greven, Olof Pantzar och Oliver Sima Petrell. De fyra männen från Aktivklubb som dömdes för misshandlarna.png

Not likely these four photos are "own work". One photo is clearly from a surveillance camera. Ariam (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opening of 2nd Festival of Russian Geographical Society 25.jpg

This request applies for the first version only, not for whole file. The first version consists screenshot with unknown copyright status, so I cropped it out. Taivo (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Old templates for linking to Wikipedia

Made obsolete by {{Wikidata infobox}} and other functionality. I don't see what any of these templates do that infoboxes and sidebar links doesn't do better. Let us deprecate them and slowly remove them. (I did not include {{See also w}} in this, since that may be used to point to non-primary articles are not suitable as a standalone gallery or category.) Rose Abrams (talk) 13:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT: Removing one of the nominated templates per recommendation below. Rose Abrams (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I found a mention on a talk page that RudolphousBot at one point had a task of deleting the template {{Mainw}} from pages, is that correct @Rudolphous? Rose Abrams (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong Oppose. The Wikidata infobox is so messy and huge (and particularly so in being vertical, thereby displacing images, which is what Commons is really for), that it is easiest and best set to hidden, which makes other small links very useful - MPF (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPF: The Infobox is vertical deliberately to minimise displacing images - with templates like 'On Wikipedia' one that are horizontal, you have to scroll past them to see the first image, which isn't the case with the Infobox. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel - it does the opposite, as the images are no longer arranged in equal number rows. - MPF (talk) 15:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're getting somewhat off-topic, but why would equal number rows be important? Is that better or worse than having to scroll down (sometimes by a whole screen) to see the first image? (e.g., Category:Miami, Florida) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel It's very confusing when the note says "The following 84 files are in this category, out of 84 total", but there aren't eight rows plus four in the 9th row, because the infobox has messed up the top few rows so they don't have ten in any more. - MPF (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The number of images shown per row is not static, though, it depends on your screen size and thumbnail size, and you can always use the 'Collapse' button in the infobox if this is an issue in a specific case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel it is static for a given screen size, of course; and in general any one person tends to use the same screen all the time. And it gets very tedious if you have to tick the 'collapse' button every single time you go to a new category - that's actually why I set it to permanent collapsed. You may think it seems trivial, but these proposals would make Commons a lot more difficult and tiresome to use. - MPF (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're talking about your use case, which doesn't necessarily match others. I personally use various screens with different sizes. Have you tried the horizontal form of the Infobox, see under 'Customisation' at Template:Wikidata_Infobox#Usage? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just the infobox, but also the interwiki links that appear in the sidebar. These two technologies equally solve the main problem of the linked templates, which is that they don't automatically link the user's preferred language which I forgot to mention in the nom.

And less related: I've never felt that the infobox being too big. And if you @MPF believe otherwise, then I feel like that's a separate and surmountable problem since we can always work to improve the infobox. Rose Abrams (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think these could be deprecated from use in gallery and category pages, but it probably still needs to be kept for file pages until we have better integration of SDC/more embedding of Wikidata information in the file templates. Pi bot removes them most of the time while adding the Infobox - I could expand that functionality at some point to more generally remove them from categories where no longer needed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm not too sure about that usecase, most WP-links I've seen on file pages just use the plain syntax like [[w:en:Example]]. But I could be wrong, and one of them do have hundreds of transclusions in filespace. And the general idea is good too. If we do such a removal, perhaps we could afterwards display a warning in the template if placed outside of filespace (such as "This template has been deprecated for use in {{NAMESPACE}}")? Rose Abrams (talk) 16:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, I was thinking about {{On Wikidata}} rather than {{On Wikipedia}}. You might be right in that case, I'll have to do a bit more digging then will revise my comment. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete {{Mainw}} and {{On Wikipedia}} - these only have 10k and 2k uses respectively and those can be bot-migrated to newer templates (I'm happy to do that in the new year). {{Multilingual link}} is a different situation, though, with 12m uses, and I think that we need to keep that for now - @Rose Abrams: I suggest removing that from this nomination, and we can do some further investigation to migrate it to something else before bringing it back here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rose Abrams (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : Template:Licence Ouverte uses one of these templates, this deletion request is now listed on the 100,000+ files in Category:Licence Ouverte. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and millions more via {{National Library in Warsaw partnership}}. I was well aware that the deletion notice would propagate very far and create server load, but I put it there in good faith to notify all concerned parties. I don't really get why these are used in templates that are already autotranslated. Rose Abrams (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per MPF, not a valid reason for deletion, all templates are heavily in-use. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for two reasons.

Firstly, {{Mainw}} (which I thoroughly dislike BTW, and would happily see the back of) is used on 10.5k pages. Is there any plan for how to convert it to its replacement?
Secondly, is there any plan for replacement? Because this DR seems to be mistitled, in a most misleading way. This doesn't look like a DR to 'clean out some obsolete templates', it looks instead like a policy change against linking to WP articles from Commons category pages. On the thoroughly dubious grounds that such a thing isn't needed, or has been superseded by infoboxes. Yet basic usability shows how necessary this linkage is (even if not done with these templates). Our readers benefit massively from having a link that is prominent, in their own language, repeats the name of the link target article (calling it 'Wikipedia' is unrecognisable to the majority of our readers) and is on the left side of the page, where we are conditioned by long habit to begin looking for it. Much as I like infoboxes, they are no substitute for a text link and the infobox design does that job of linking quite badly. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: I'm willing to work on bot migration of Mainw's usage to the Infobox - either removing it where it is already duplicated, or adding the Infobox where it's missing (using the template contents) where necessary - and then there wlil be some manual cleanup, but 10k usages isn't so much to work through. I'm not convinced that readers expect interwiki links on the left side of the page or with particular formatting that isn't standard across most Wikimedia projects, particularly when we're talking about a template that isn't used that much any more. The Infoboxes do provide a more standard link (across 5m+ categories now) that fits in with the rest of the content they provide. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So you're also using this one TfD as an excuse for a pretty sizable apparent UI change for our readership? The strongest possible oppose to that. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? We're talking about a small number of pages using an old template, not a mass UI change across the whole project? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"interwiki links on the left side of the page" Andy Dingley (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arsya Tiara Shafa (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Indonesia.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arsya Tiara Shafa (talk · contribs)

Low quality photo with no camera info in the metadata. Similarly sized photos of the uploader were substantially captured from Instagram.

File:Steel Symphony at Ngebrak Bridge.jpg

0x0a (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devi Jagdamba.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.dollsofindia.com/product/hindu-posters/prakriti-cosmic-mother-nature-reprint-on-glazed-paper-CM01.html GMG ^talk 14:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old upload and my knowledge of the subject matter is limited. There is a dated usage here from one month after upload. It doesn't seem likely to be own work, but it may be suitable depending on the actual source. GMG ^talk 14:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:宮島口（湍津姫命）.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Greenricegoddess (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:宮島口.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Greenricegoddess (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Rudolph - 4a54dc6b85.jpg

Artwork made at an unknown point in time by American artist who passed away in 1996 (David Phillip Anderson), not out of copyright, no permission. Nutshinou (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Module:PIDDateHelper

All functions previously provided by this module have been merged into Module:PIDCategoryHelper. This module is now unused and can be safely deleted. Tausheef Hassan (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Module:SourcePIDHelper

All functions previously provided by this module have been merged into Module:PIDCategoryHelper. This module is now unused and can be safely deleted. Tausheef Hassan (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandeep chaudhary.jpg

Selfie of non-contributor, previously used on abandoned draft page on English Wikipedia en:Draft:Sandeep Chaudhary Btrs (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:災害時のトイレがあります (2525130052).jpg

COM:FOP Japan SomeFancyUsername (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Is this sign placed by the government? It might qualify for {{PD-Japan-exempt}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SARS Covid.jpg

Image name and description do not correspond to the image subject Btrs (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sasasas4.jpg

Selfie image of non-contributor, not in use Btrs (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somali Community of Minnesota—Population Distribution and Cultural Identity.png

COPYVIO from [2] and [3]. The uploaders chatbot says: I now understand that images found via Google are not automatically free to use, and that this means the file does not meet Wikimedia Commons copyright requirements. The concerns raised about possible copyright violations are therefore valid. [4] Polygnotus (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Gurkubondinn (talk) 10:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:225Ac-PSMA-617.png

Extremely low-quality chemical structure with absolutely no details visible. Replaced by File:225Ac-PSMA-617.svg as high-quality vector version. ChemSim (Talk) 15:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per ChemSim. At this low level of resolution, the image is useless. Marbletan (talk) 13:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mickey Mouse Toy.jpg

Violation of COM:TOYS. Character based on copyrighted depictions. The toy itself is also copyrighted. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - clear copyright violation. Mickey Mouse is copyrighted and trademarked. —SimmeD (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butrint Xhemajli portrait.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably could be quickly deleted under F10. I deleted the corresponding Wikidata item. Ternera (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plan général des chapelles.jpg

Ne m'appartient pas, information & plan sensible. propriété mairie & cabinet d'archicte. Merci d'en supprimer toute trace svp NSCP (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This building was built more than 700 years ago, so the floor plan is public domain. France has no freedom of panorama also, but this building is more than 700 years old, so it's also public domain. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no, this plan in particular is not public, and some informations about stairs, treasures and hidden doors should not be exposed. i can replace it by a basic and less detailled map;TownHall ask for deletion, i upload it by error, please be kind and proceed for deletion.NSCP (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SECURITY – « Sensitive diagrams, detailed floor plans, or other media that could facilitate illegal or dangerous activities may be deleted. »

Thanxs for your comprehension. NSCP (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NSCP, did you generate this statement with a chatbot? There is no such page. Regarding this matter, I added details from court rulings related to architectural plans (COM:TOO France), and it appears that this plan is not sufficiently original to be protected by French copyright law. Therefore, I modified the license. If there are security issues, they should be justified, particularly by indicating the regulation that prevents the disclosure of this plan. — Baidax ^💬 17:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not original enough. See COM:TOO France. — Baidax ^💬 17:06, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Baidax. J'ai proposé de remettre un autre plan, mais sans détails sensibles (noms de certains lieux, escaliers, coursives). J'utilise mal wikipedia, c'est moi qui ai ajouté cette image, j'en demande la suppresion, je propose d'en mettre une simplifiée. Merci NSCP (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hazaribagh Storm.jpg

Source file w:bn:চিত্র:Storm Hazaribagh.jpg was deleted as lacking licensing information. It's likely that the free CC license here was not from the original uploader from BnWiki. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 16:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вячеслав Молотов (1947).jpg

None of the sources cited for the photo portrait confirm its attribution to TASS. The portrait is not available in TASS's own photo bank. A search for sources attributing the portrait to TASS yielded no results. At least one copy [5] is credited to Grigory Mikhailovich Wail (as Г. Вайль) died in 1975. As a photographic work by Grigory Mikhailovich Wail (Григорий Михайлович Вайль), not commissioned by TASS, the portrait is copyrighted in Russia until 2050 (1976+74). Yellow Horror (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shreyash Jadhav.jpg

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sindhuli dada.jpg

no educational use imaginable, due to completely missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nikasandler

entirely promotional content inappropriate for a user page Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:1958 Mr. Clean Commercial Debut.webm

Dublicate of File:Mr. Clean Introduction Advertisement 1958.webm SomeFancyUsername (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polyamory Throughout the Ages.jpg

Unused text document, out of scope. ~2025-39860-23 (talk) 18:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure this could be used on the Wikipedia page for polyamory and other related pages. Helper201 (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montpellier tramway network map.pdf

Copyvio, not created by uploader Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 18:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lightning at Yellow Creek State Park - panoramio.jpg

Very low resolution (427x320px) import from Panoramio. More good images exist at Category:Cloud-to-ground lightning in the United States and elsewhere. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 18:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cazé TV logo.png

This logo is clearly above the threshold of originality. It needs a free license. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the licenses are correct; they contain the logo and text, nothing more than that. I think it meets the requirements to be maintained. But let's see what the decision is. Nicolas Baldin (talk) 00:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:NL-HaHGA 8100-01 1.13106.jpg

Source website says copyright status undetermined. Mbch331 (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skizze 03.png

no use imaginable without proper description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung E-1200 Phone Photo Türkiye.jpg

çünkü eski fotoğraf daha güzeldi BOLU1466 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kötü gözüküyor BOLU1466 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kötü ve fazla eğimli BOLU1466 (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

çünkü eski fotoğraf daha güzeldi BOLU1466 (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kötü gözüküyor BOLU1466 (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kötü ve fazla eğimli BOLU1466 (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion was requested by the uploader shortly after upload but file is COM:INUSE at ru.wp and Wikidata. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Подпись Андрея Козлова.png

This file is uploaded with a fake license. User who uploaded the file is not the author of the signature. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo della Giustizia (Bolzano)

No FoP in Italy. This building's architects died only in 1966 (Paolo Rossi De Paoli) and 1981 (Michele Busiri Vici). Should still be protected by copyright. --Aciarium (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Friniate: would this building be covered by {{PD-ItalyGov}} ? Abzeronow (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow I think it does, as we can read here it was commissioned by the State administration. It was finished in 1956 (see here), therefore it fell under PD in 1977. No issue with US copyright. Friniate (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Friniate Thank you for clarifying! What would be the next steps now, except for adding the corresponding FoP template to the nominated files? --Aciarium (talk) 15:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aciarium It's not a FoP template, but a PD, Template:PD-ItalyGov (sorry for the correction, just to be sure that there are no misunderstandings ;-) )... What do you mean by the "next steps"? Friniate (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I meant PD-ItalyGov indeed, but my paraphrasing was unlucky at best - thanks for clarifying :)

As I could understand by your other comment, eventually the deletion request will be concluded by the closing admin. After that: Is it up to me to remove Template:Delete from the corresponding pages, or is this a bot-based process? And: Should I already add Template:PD-Italy to the files without the fountain, while the deletion request is still open? --Aciarium (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aciarium I've added PD-ItalyGov myself, the licensing is now ok :-)

As for the deletion template I don't know, probably @Abzeronow can give more answers than me... Friniate (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Friniate Alright, thank you! :) --Aciarium (talk) 22:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge the validity of the dispute. Having verified the death dates of architects Paolo Rossi De Paoli (1966) and Michele Busiri Vici (1981), it is clear that the work in question is still protected by copyright in Italy (until 2052).

I also understand that Italian law does not provide full Freedom of Panorama (FoP) allowing the use of images for commercial purposes, which makes their permanence on Wikimedia Commons incompatible with the CC-BY-SA licenses used.

I therefore accept that the images indicated must be removed.

Giovanni Ussi (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Giovanni Ussi No, no, read above, there's no need to delete, since it's a building commissioned by a public administration :-) Friniate (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whereas the building is ok, I've much more doubts on File:Bozen Gerichtsgebäude.JPG because of the fountain. It was made by it:Eraldo Fozzer and as we can read here it wasn't commissioned by the Municipality of Bolzano, which bought it in 1960 from the Municipality of Trento. But judging from this article with an interview with the daughter of the artist, it wasn't formally commissioned by the Municipality of Trento either. Therefore my guess is that it is still under copyright until 2066. That image would therefore be admissible only considering the fountain as de minimis. I'll leave the decision to the closing admin.--Friniate (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fountain seems a bit too prominent to be de minimis to me, and would be troublesome to crop out. (EDIT: But then again, the building is the subject and the fountain doesn't take too much space in the photograph. Fountain is definitely not a cut-and-dried thing on the DM question). Abzeronow (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the whole discussion is nonsense. If you want to delete this image do it but bear in mind that nobody cares about your "doubts" nor about this presumed copyright. In Italy we have a saying: "Più realista del re". I have long made my mind not to upload any image more because I do not want to make gifts to this ludicrous prude institution (Wikipedia) which only cares about elite interests. So long. Gehadad (talk) 07:52, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexis Rateau exhibition in Tours - France 2020.jpg

The photo shows a photo exhibition were the main motif are the photos. There is no indication that the Alexis Rateau, who took the exhibited images, has agreed to having them published with a compatible license. C messier (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexis Rateau exhibition Salon photo Paris.jpg

The photo shows a photo exhibition were the main motif are the photos. There is no indication that the Alexis Rateau, who took the exhibited images, has agreed to having them published with a compatible license. C messier (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferrocarril al Pacífico. Puntarenas. Costa Rica.jpg

No source/author information that indicates the claimed license is valid. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Kajberuniq (5th Century).jpg

Doubtful to be an own work, looks like it was scanned from a book. C messier (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kajberunik province in the 19th century.jpg

Doubtful to be an own work, looks like it was scanned from a book. C messier (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danakan.jpg

غلاف كتاب محمي Mohammed Qays 🗣 19:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

استخدامه ضمن مقال عن الكتاب نفسه يعتبر ضمن الاستخدام العادل Fair use Nic1977 (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitris Kiriakopoulos.jpg

Unused personal image, out of scope (COM:NOTUSED) C messier (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitris Kiriakopoulos 1.jpg

Unused personal image, out of scope (COM:NOTUSED) C messier (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jim i.jpg

Unused personal image, out of scope (COM:NOTUSED) C messier (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. John Ralph in 2017.jpg

I may be wrong, but the Wisconsin Energy Institute isn't part of the Federal Goverment, but of the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and thus the current license is wrong. There is also a copyright symbol at the end of the page. C messier (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Alex Wiedenhoeft in 2015.jpg

There is no indication that the photo in the source page (which is of the University of Wisconsin–Madison) is a work of a federal officer or employee and not of an employee of the university, and thus the license is wrong and image is thus copyrighted. C messier (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Данил Бестик.jpg

self promotion, with few educational purpose Pippobuono (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hilltop youth shouting "Death to Arabs" in Turmus Ayya.webm

This video features several identifiable minors. No parental consent was given for filming or for publishing this material. Its upload constitutes an invasion of the children's privacy, and I request that it be removed. BananaNotes (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The video shows an organized public gathering in a public space. There is no basis for deletion. יורם שורק (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In Israel, if the recording or photo was taken in a public place, the mere act of filming may not by itself be illegal. BUT publishing such recordings, especially if they show the minor doing something that could embarrass or harm their dignity (swearing, misbehavior, insults, etc.) may be considered a violation of their privacy rights under the same standards that apply for adults. Many practitioners argue this is even more sensitive with children. If publication is done without parental consent, the parent/guardian may have a legal claim. [6] BananaNotes (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The video was taken in Palestine not in Israel so that Israeli law has no relevance even if Israeli citizens appear in it. Embarrassment is culturally dependent and the behaviour of the young people conform with the norms in their society. יורם שורק (talk) 08:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. Jurisdiction is a bit more complex: even if the video was recorded outside Israeli jurisdiction, Israeli privacy and tort laws may still apply to the publication of identifiable images of minors by an Israeli citizen or on platforms operating under Israeli law. In most legal systems, minors receive heightened privacy protection regardless of cultural norms, and the fact that the behavior is common or not considered embarrassing locally does not remove the question of whether publishing identifiable footage of minors without parental consent is permissible. Because this concerns minors, it is generally advisable to rely on legal sources rather than cultural interpretations. BananaNotes (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This video features several identifiable minors. No parental consent was given for filming or for publishing this material. Its upload constitutes an invasion of the children's privacy, and I request that it be removed. --BananaNotes (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandas musicales Paine.png

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:III Wyprawa Polskich Biologów na Antarktydę ALipkowski 2od-lew1973.jpg

Looks like a scan from an old newspaper. Apparently, "source={{own}}" & "author=MMalawski" & "{{self|cc-zero}}" are erroneous. In May this year, the uploader was asked in pl:wiki to correct it, but ignored the request. Michał Ski (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination The erroneous data has been corrected. Michał Ski (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Adeimantos (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: as previously, these are AI-generated simulated page images, not real screenshots of typesetting output. Please actually run the typesetter and take a screenshot of its output to use as an example.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChatGPT Image 10 de dez. de 2025, 02 43 14.png

Out of scope: AI-generated faux logo. Unclear that this would be freely licensed even if it were real. Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gullapool - panoramio.jpg

So badly blurred as to be of no realistic use, thus out of Commons scope. Commons already has many hundreds of much better photos of the same species. MPF (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:University of Eastern Finland logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no source (No source since): Likely below COM:TOO Finland. Jonteemil (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A file that lacks a source is sufficient grounds for deletion in accordance with COM:CSD#F5, especially when the image is claimed to be a university logo, which means it cannot be considered the uploader's "own work." The question of whether it meets the threshold of originality (TOO) is not relevant. Wcam (talk) 04:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that we delete files that lack a source because then we can't know its copyright status. But with files below TOO however, its copyright status is non-existant, hence it doesn't matter. As can be seen at https://mediabank.uef.fi/main/galleryview/qsr=Logo it's clearly the university's logo. Just remove {{Self}} from the license and update the source to University of Eastern Finland and we have a perfectly good file.

Keep Jonteemil (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:LSV Worms Logo.png

Die Kombination aus Schrift, Form und Farbe könnte Schöpfungshöhe haben, Copyright unklar (Ein Verein kann nicht Inhaber des Copyrights sein, nur natürliche Personen). GerritR (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WikiGrower1 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused low-quality images of geometric figures and designs. No clear educational purpose.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion of File:Purple circle.webp because of its use on the page for copyright in the United States as an example of a shape not eligible for copyright. I would recommend caution on this mass nomination so that each image could at least be viewed for how they have been used in context. Lethargilistic (talk) 23:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should I remove the deletion tags to prevent it from being deleted. WikiGrower1 (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use; I've replaced the usage at en:Copyright law of the United States#Originality with a similar vector image. Omphalographer (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WikiGrower1 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused "pinup" photos of women posting in bikinis or similarly revealing attire. No clear educational purpose.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Beach rock 2025.jpg, which is File:Summer bikini young women beauty fashion.jpg with the figure edited out (but the shadows left behind). Omphalographer (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not granually familiar with Commons' policies, but just calling pictures "pinup" does not seem like it is enough for them to be deleted for lack of any conceivable educational purpose. There are a lot of explicit snuff films on Commons, some of which I have opposed in the past on similar grounds. IIRC, they were just kept under "Not Censored" or whatever. Like, it is an understatement to call this material "tame" in comparison to controversial subject matter on Commons. Lethargilistic (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used Apple cleanup to remove the women to have the image in addition. I like the background in addition and I like the image with the girl. I don’t know why it is nominated for deletion. WikiGrower1 (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don’t delete more romance pictures without any good reason (example copyright). We are running really low on good romance pictures. This photo is used and has an educational purpose. This is better than the average ones. The education purpose is to show the feel of romance. Other pictures don’t give you the same feel. Most romance pictures in the commons are OLD. WikiGrower1 (talk) 23:32, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Selfie.jpg]]

AI-generated deletion objection has been collapsed

keep File:Cancun bikini.jpg This image provides clear educational value and falls within the scope of Wikimedia Commons for the following reasons: Illustrative Utility for Fashion/Textiles: The image serves as a high-quality contemporary example of specific swimwear styles (bikini) and can be used to illustrate articles regarding [fashion trends], [beachwear], or the [textile industry]'s evolution of synthetic fabrics in water-resistant clothing. Regional/Tourism Context: As noted in the metadata, this illustrates typical tourist activity and cultural norms for vacation attire in [Cancun], which is educationally relevant for travel-related documentation or sociological study of resort culture. High Quality vs. Private Snap: The image is technically sound and distinct from low-quality personal snapshots. It provides a clear, focused subject that effectively serves as a visual reference for the topics mentioned above. Future Potential: While not currently in an article, the file meets the "realistically usable" requirement by providing a free-licensed resource for future content regarding public health (sun exposure), fashion design history, or tourism economics. This is a legitimate contribution to the "sum of all human knowledge" by documenting a specific cultural and aesthetic moment. WikiGrower1 (talk) 00:29, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COM:NOTCENSORED is not, in and of itself, a reason to keep files. The file I'm assuming you're referring to (the one in this DR?) was kept because it documented a notable historical event, and is in use as such on numerous wikis; that clearly doesn't apply to these images. Omphalographer (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it isn’t being used no one is being harmed. WikiGrower1 (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - File:Cancun bikini.jpg This image provides clear educational value and falls within the scope of Wikimedia Commons for the following reasons:

Illustrative Utility for Fashion/Textiles: The image serves as a high-quality contemporary example of specific swimwear styles (bikini) and can be used to illustrate articles regarding [fashion trends], [beachwear], or the [textile industry]'s evolution of synthetic fabrics in water-resistant clothing.

Regional/Tourism Context: As noted in the metadata, this illustrates typical tourist activity and cultural norms for vacation attire in [Cancun], which is educationally relevant for travel-related documentation or sociological study of resort culture.

High Quality vs. Private Snap: The image is technically sound and distinct from low-quality personal snapshots. It provides a clear, focused subject that effectively serves as a visual reference for the topics mentioned above.

Future Potential: While not currently in an article, the file meets the "realistically usable" requirement by providing a free-licensed resource for future content regarding public health (sun exposure), fashion design history, or tourism economics.

This is a legitimate contribution to the "sum of all human knowledge" by documenting a specific cultural and aesthetic moment. WikiGrower1 (talk) 21:35, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also keep File:Randi in Wedding Dress.jpg it is already being used in Dress Wikipedia article to show a wedding dress. It is really good quality. Also keep File:Summer bikini young women beauty fashion.jpg this is a good photo for beauty fashion. It is really hard to replace beauty fashion pics because often times it is used in commercial use with copyrighted status. Also do you think we should have a beauty fashion gallery to preserve images? WikiGrower1 (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a deep oversimplification to say a video of a random person being killed should be kept because it's "documenting a historical event." But I would recommend looking at the other videos uploaded by the same guy. As I recall, they prolifically uploaded snuff films that had nothing to do with any particular event. But, to address the current nomination more directly, the point that I'm trying to make is that "pinup" is not equivalent to "not educational." I think that deleting on this basis alone—and that is the only basis that has been suggested—would be more harmful than keeping the pictures, tbh. Lethargilistic (talk) 01:50, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WikiGrower1 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: 2007 event calendars for a RC hobby club; no conceivable educational use.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Danny soare (talk · contribs)

Big collection of what look to be test images, possibly not within project scope

Geoffroi 21:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xiushanosteus.png

Out of scope: AI-generated paleoart. Per en:WP:PALEOART, "AI-generated paleoart is not accepted [on the English Wikipedia], and will be removed and nominated for deletion when encountered. From our experience, AI paleoart is always inaccurate, and since it derives from copyrighted, human-made artwork, is is both unethical and legally questionable." Omphalographer (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Compared to original file, AI processed image clearly has inconsistencies, with the right pectoral fin appearing like a dorsal fin and the right armor spine appearing to be on top, which is simply misleading and extremely inaccurate. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it is worth noting that the author of the original image once requested deletion, saying that they did not want the image to be used on Wikipedia. Judging from the Wikipedia contribution history, the reason appears to be protests over its inclusion of gory images in articles such as a cross-section of a shark and "Saturn Devouring His Son." Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per en:WP:PALEOART guidelines. LittleLazyLass (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Adommo Shafiq Nazrul (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: various unused selfies, photos of family members, promotional posters and book covers, etc.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arqueo de caja menor.pdf

Out of scope: plain text. If you are trying to write an encyclopedia article, please read es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Omphalographer (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa de distribuição-range Plebeia minima.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa de distribuição-range Plebeia droryana.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Plebeia wittmanni.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Scaptotrigona bipunctata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Scaura longula.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"flickr.com/photos/uk_parliament/"

The Flickr page applies the licence **Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0** and also links to the official UK Parliament photographic licence: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/use-of-parliamentary-photographic-images/

Both licences contain: - Non-commercial (NC) restriction - No-derivatives (ND) restriction - Additional conditions that prohibit modification and certain types of use

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:48, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I created this page because "https://" was disallowed in a page name due to the title blacklist. I copied the original rationale verbatim from Special:Diff/1128833517 by Mike Rohsopht. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll note, that some of these (e.g. File:George Galloway sworn in Commons (2024-03-04).jpg) have a separate (and commons appropriate) CC BY 3.0 licence in their flikr description (for example for that one: Copyright Notice: Please ensure that copyright is acknowledged and all images are credited when published online and in print. Terms and Conditions : This photo, and all related crops, are released under an Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) license. This means that you can use, share and adapt it, as long as you give proper attribution, provide a link to the license, and indicate any changes.) Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete File:Chris Hinchliff MP (North East Hertfordshire, Labour).jpg, File:Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP (Chingford and Woodford Green, Conservative).jpg, File:Graham Stringer MP (Blackley and Middleton South, Labour) (cropped).jpg, File:Graham Stringer MP (Blackley and Middleton South, Labour).jpg, File:Tim Farron MP (Westmorland and Lonsdale, Liberal Democrat).jpg, File:Tim Farron MP (Westmorland and Lonsdale, Liberal Democrat) (cropped).jpg, File:Daisy Cooper MP (St Albans, Liberal Democrat).jpg, File:James McMurdock MP (South Basildon and East Thurrock, Reform UK).jpg, File:Alex Burghart MP (Brentwood and Ongar, Conservative).jpg;

Keep the rest as every other one of them has a specific release under CC BY 3 listed in the description (see my above comment for example of what that looks like). Also

Keep on File:House of Lords as the Court of Requests.jpg as the given {{PD-Art-old-100}} seems appropriate explanation that that one is PD. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Flickr account an official UK Government publication? If so, does that make its works eligible for the Open Government Licence? (I don't know the answer to either question but they would be important considerations.) Also, several files were reviewed and confirmed as CC-By-SA at the time (16 by Mdaniels5757, one each by Magog the Ogre, Jmabel, and A1Cafel, courtesy pings). Given the number of reviewers and different dates, it seems likely the licence was changed on Flickr after the photos were imported to Commons. Individual notes:
File:George Galloway sworn in Commons (2024-03-04).jpg, File:Second Letwin Amendment Result.jpg, File:Graham Stringer MP (Blackley and Middleton South, Labour) (cropped).jpg, File:Graham Stringer MP (Blackley and Middleton South, Labour).jpg, File:Tim Farron MP (Westmorland and Lonsdale, Liberal Democrat).jpg, File:Tim Farron MP (Westmorland and Lonsdale, Liberal Democrat) (cropped).jpg, File:Daisy Cooper MP (St Albans, Liberal Democrat).jpg, File:James McMurdock MP (South Basildon and East Thurrock, Reform UK).jpg, File:Alex Burghart MP (Brentwood and Ongar, Conservative) (cropped).jpg, and File:Alex Burghart MP (Brentwood and Ongar, Conservative).jpg are tagged as OGL.
File:House of Lords as the Court of Requests.jpg is {{PD-Art-old-100}} (artist died 1840) so should obviously be kept regardless of Flickr status.
File:Blackford Frontbench 2019.jpg says "©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/ Stephen Pike", which would suggest the OGL is applicable.

—Harry Mitchell (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It may be worth checking this discussion and following the links to see if any of these photographs are also included on the AssetBank site (although navigating it is very difficult). Robin S. Taylor (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell, an OGL licence, by definition, only is used by the UK Government, and these images are from the UK Parliament (not the government). There is a {{OPL}} (Open Parliament Licence) but that tends not to be apliped to images. In any case, whether its {{OGL}} or {{OPL}}, these are not automatic and have to be specificly appened to conetent for them to apply. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 08:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cakelot1 thanks for the clarification on OGL vs OPL. I'm still not sure about the licence reviews though (perhaps the reviewers can shed some light)—19 of the images were reviewed and confirmed to be available on Flickr under the stated licence, so it seems more likely that the Flickr account has changed its licencing retrospectively. Harry Mitchell (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in my comment above the ones that have been reviewed have CC-BY-3.0 licences manually added in the description of their respective Flickr pages (e.g. File:Blackford Frontbench 2019.jpg which specifically calls out the text in the description of Flickr page) As far as I can see every single one that was reviewed continues to have the same licence listed in their description. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:04, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Scaura latitarsis.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragonisca fiebrigi.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sunests (talk · contribs)

Spam images of non-contributor, Commons is not your personal image web host!

Btrs (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Schwarziana quadripunctata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragona clavipes.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragona goettei.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragona quadrangula.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragonisca weyrauchi.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Tetragonisca angustula.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Geotrigona mombuca.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sateesh patil.jpg

Selfie of non-contributor, previously used on abandoned draft page on English Wikipedia en:Draft:Sateesh patil Btrs (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Cephalotrigona femorata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Cephalotrigona capitata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Friesella schrottkyi.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Frieseomelitta silvestrii.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Satveer singh jawandha (talk · contribs)

Selfies of non-contributor, previously in use on user page on Hindi Wikipedia, which was blanked by admins afterwards

Btrs (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Frieseomelitta longipes.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Frieseomelitta languida.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Satya .jpg

Selfie of non-contributor, previously used on abandoned draft page on English Wikipedia: en:Draft:Satya Prakash Sahoo Btrs (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Frieseomelitta varia.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição range Paratrigona lineata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Paratrigona lineata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição range Frieseomelitta doederleini.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Frieseomelitta doederleini.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição da abelha Paratrigona subnuda.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saurabh xotic (talk · contribs)

Self-promotion images, previously used in deleted user page on English Wikipedia: en:User:Saurabh xotic

Btrs (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribuição-range Scaptotrigona polysticta.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Range of Nannotrigona testaceicornis.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribution of Paratrigona Lineata.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa de distribuição da abelha Paratrigona subnuda.jpg

Mapchart.net map, non-free, needs deletion Luisgabriel007 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saurav Kumar.jpg

Spam image from blocked user on English Wikipedia: Special:CentralAuth/Saurav2512 Btrs (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vloreairport.jpg

grabbed from the web (published at several locations, e.g. here: https://australianaviation.com.au/2015/01/adelaide-airport-masterplan-approved/ ) and wrong description Albinfo (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:AI image of a fairy with a person in bed.jpg

Out of scope; low-quality early AI art without discernible faces Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the quality is way too low. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sulfone functional group.png

Low-quality formula for sulfones. Reason: "The R groups should have superscript numbers, not subscript". Alfa-ketosav (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a modified PNG image. Although it's of average quality, I believe this format is still accepted on Wikipedia. Good wiki!-Grasso Luigi (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alkanon.png

Mixed notation (if there is an R¹ group, the other group shall be R², not simply R). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

other references mention that ketones R with R¹ https://www.chemistrysteps.com/functional-groups/ Lemonwithices (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can scroll down to the ketone section. Lemonwithices (talk) 23:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SaMo.jpg

F10. Personal files by non-contributors MJXVI (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Michael Tianbi Chen

All the files were created as screenshots taken from YouTube videos claiming those videos were uploaded under a Creative Commons license. However, all of these videos disappear from search results when filtered for Creative Commons uploads. Therefore, the files are not free. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernard Lachèvre - 8e54244873.jpg

Painting made by living French artist (Léon Lacas), not out of copyright, no permission. Nutshinou (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:St-Ours-Tremblement-terre.jpg

very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Jean-Pierre-Saint-Ours-4.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial (right) of Theodore and Mabel Bent, St Mary's, Theydon Bois, UK.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Diannaa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/196689942/mabel_virginia_anna-bent. Watermarked "The Bent Archive"from There are only two possibilities here: (1) findagrave.com took this from Riga-to-Rangoon; (2) this is a blatant copyvio. @Riga-to-Rangoon: do you have an explanation? Jmabel ! talk 22:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - well spotted... The Bent Archive IS ME (www.tambent.com) and I took this photo several years ago. I loaded the snap on Find a Grave too and it also appears in my editions of Mabel Bent's diaries (Archaeopress, Oxford). I'm very happy to have this snap in the public domain and hope people will go visit the Bents. Hope this solves the issue, or do get back to me. Kind regards. Riga-to-Rangoon (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riga-to-Rangoon: You probably should do one of two things here: indicate at tambent.com that you control this Wikipedia account or send COM:VRT a message to that effect (and referencing this file and any others on Commons published there). This is definitely a case of uploading content that was published before its upload to Commons, and with no publicly available information indicating that both publications were by the same person. - Jmabel ! talk 19:15, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - very many thanks. How about if i go back to the folder of digital photos I took and upload a different one (i.e. that has not appeared anywhere before)? I took a great many snaps at the time I visited the Bents' grave. I think a photo of the grave is an appropriate and fitting image to include. Kind regards Riga-to-Rangoon (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine, but unless this is the one and only photo affected, the VRT approach would be better. Or something like I do here, but I understand if you wouldn't want that public a connection between the two accounts. - Jmabel ! talk 19:56, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Confessions-shopaholic-sophie-kinsella.jpeg

Likely copyrighted. Uploaded by a one-shot user. I was not able to find the source page using Archive.org. Gumruch (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kullaberg, Nordens Riviera, Arthur Rube.jpg

Book cover by the artist "Schmidts" of a 1925 book. Too recent to assume that the artist has been dead for at least 70 years. May be undeleted in 2046 if the illustrator is still unknown by then. Thuresson (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:USMC-04127.jpg

Out of scope; not in use The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IShowMuhammad (talk · contribs)

Small files, no exif, some available online in bigger amd more complete versions, own work claims doubtful, possible copyright violations (I've tagged 4 videogame screenshots via CSD from this user as well)

Geoffroi 23:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brunoytweety2018.jpg

Out of scope: personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brunopinto1.jpg

Out of scope: personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brunoyoaki.jpg

Out of scope: personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bajosrecursos.jpg

Out of scope: personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live capture mousetrap.jpg

This image was uploaded by me some years back. I don't think it's educationally useful, hence requesting for deletion. RIDH-1 (talk) 05:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dillah Hikmah Sari, Bupati Tanjabtim.jpg

There is already the original file, namely File:Bupati Tanjung Jabung Timur, Dillah Hikmah Sari.png and this file appears to have been edited using AI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuser9876543212022 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/S2352226721000350

Taken from a journal article which was published by Science Direct under a CC license, but it is a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. So the files should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 10:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]